- The SIMD-228 proposes to replace the solid inflation of the solany by a dynamic emission mechanism adapted to the speed of sting to adapt to the rewards of validators to the network needs.
- This reform could increase the soil and potentially rare, but raises concerns about the economic viability of small validators if inflation drops too low.
- The debate divides the ecosystem: Some such as Anatoles Yakovenko and Mert Mumtaz support this proposal, while Lily Liu fears its impact on institutional investors and requires greater reflection.
Basic change in the Tokenomice Solany
Network Solara He is preparing for a vote of a proposal that could deeply transform his monetary policy. The Document to improve Solan 228 (SIMD-228)carried Tushar Jain AND Vishal Kancani Multicoin capital with support Max Resnickeconomist in Anze, the goal is Replace the current model of fixed inflation by mechanism dynamic emissions modified to the market.
Currently, Solana inflation monitors the pre -diagram: 4.6% per yearwith an annual reduction 15%until he reaches the floor 1.5%. SIMD-228 offers Combine the new soil to the speed of stab : The lower the number of soil bets, the more the emissions of the new tokens increase to encourage sting. Conversely, if stuking is high, the rewards decrease, reducing inflation.
Direct impact on validators and investors
Accepting this model Introduces flexibility in network securityAvoid excessive reward of validators when stuking is already high. Theoretically it could do that Rarer and potentially rare landan argument that tempts long -term investors.
However, the consequences for validators and stakes, especially the smallest, are still vague. If inflation decreases sharply when stuking is high, Network rewards could be insufficientIt threatens the economic viability of the smallest actors.
According to estimates, if SIMD-228 is accepted, annual inflation under the current degree of download 65% could fall under 1%. If the participation of the download should go down 33%The floor threshold defined by the design, the emission rate would be adjusted to maintain sufficient security.
A shredded debate in the ecosystem of Solan
While some ecosystem leaders see this proposal as a positive break, others are more skeptical. Anatoly yakovenkoco -founder Solana as well as Mert Mumtazfounder Helius, have Have collapsed support for SIMD-228. Mert believes that the proposal strengthens the networkAt the same time, to acknowledge that the discussion of which is from it remain beneficial, even in the event of rejection.
On the other hand, Lily liuPresident of the Solana Foundationis concerned about the potential impacts on institutional investors. According to her The proposal still lacks maturityEspecially due to fluctuating repository revenues that could destabilize certain financial players. Expressed its reservations about X and qualified SIMD-228 as “Too Rough” And call for more reflection.
In the face of criticism, Authors Simd-228 prevented their workemphasizing that the proposal was subject to Nearly two months of discussion and adjustments Since January. According to them, it is based on analyzes in depth and meets the needs of network development.
A fundamental vote for the economic future of Solana
The Voting on SIMD-228 should take place During the epoch 753which could start this weekend. Its acceptance or rejection will present a decisive point of turnover for the future Solany token And its attraction with investors and validators.
While Solana continues to grow and attracts a growing number of projects and users, the question and Sustainable economic model It remains in the heart of fear. The SIMD-228 It is an attempt to adapt to the dynamics of the market, but its long -term impact remains uncertain.
The article Solan in the face of the great reform of his inflation model: the Simd-228 divides the community first appeared at the Academy of Coin Academy